Facial recognition is increasingly aiding the fight against human trafficking and locating missing people-and particularly missing children-when the technology is paired with AI that creates maturation images to bridge the missing years. These outright bans ignore that surveillance cameras can help protect victims of domestic violence against abuser trespassing, help women create safety networks when traveling on their own, and reduce instances of abuse of power by law enforcement. But the contemporary proposals of unnuanced bans on the technology will stall improvements to its accuracy and hinder its safe integration, to the detriment of vulnerable populations. The two central concerns about facial recognition technology are its deficiencies in recognizing the faces of minority groups-leading, for example, to false positive searches and arrests-and its increase in population surveillance more generally. In 2019, California enacted a three-year moratorium on the use of facial recognition technology in police body cameras. have passed bans on government facial recognition. Take for example perhaps the most controversial technologies that privacy advocates avidly seek to ban: facial recognition. We should focus on regulating misuse rather than banning collection. Yet a default assumption that data collection is harmful is simply misguided. We rightfully fear surveillance when it is designed to use our personal information in harmful ways. Too much privacy-just like too little privacy-can undermine the ways we can use information for progressive change. Privileging privacy, instead of openly acknowledging the need to balance privacy with fuller and representative data collection, obscures the many ways in which data is a public good. While we have always faced difficult choices between competing values-safety, health, access, freedom of expression and equality-advances in technology make it increasingly possible for data to be anonymized and secured to balance individual interests with the public good. But privacy is just one of our democratic society’s many values, and prohibiting safe and equitable data collection can conflict with other equally valuable social goals. Privacy is important when it protects people against harmful surveillance and public disclosure of personal information. Congress, The American Data Privacy and Protection Act, similarly seeks to further privacy’s primacy. Data minimization is the default set in Europe by the GDPR and a new bill before U.S. The Federal Trade Commission and other central regulators aim to strengthen protections against the collection of personal data. Privacy has long dominated our social and legal debates about technology.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |